Blackwood's diatonic behaviour of xenharmonic equal temperament
Blackwood's Modes and Chord Progressions in Equal Tunings (1991) put the traditional functional harmony and chord progression into a new context, non-12 equal temperament, in other equal temperament numbers, nineteen, seventeen, sixteen, and fifteen. His article describes what if the subdominants, dominants, or tonic chords are applied in these ET.
Blackwood proposes two major concepts of interval property, Dissonance versus Discordance. Dissonance describes the interval property between, it is not based on the sonic experience to our ears, pure or harsh. If the interval is defined as major 3rd, perfect 5th, major 6th or octave etc. It is always described as a consonant; if verse versa, dissonant. A chord that contains a combination of tendency notes, such as a dominant seventh, a diminished seventh, or an augmented sixth; these latter are dissonant intervals/chords whatever the tuning, disregarding the how it sounds. Consonant and dissonant are paired to describe in terms the harmonic intervals.
It is contrasting to the elaboration of Sethares (2010), measuring sonic experience by the dissonant curve. The perfect fifth can sound dissonant of the inharmonic nature of an instrument (see inharmonicity). On the contrary, Blackwood's discordance is the word that is regarded as Sethares's dissonant, describing our hearing experience. In Blackwood's example, major and minor thirds are consonant intervals described as "jangling discord" in non-diatonic behaviour with equal temperament.
Comments
Post a Comment